Yesterday I
posted on a couple of theologians who throw their support behind the use of
statistics for the development of missiological strategies. Here are a couple
of well-known theologians who caution against the potential misuse of
the science.
Edward Rommen
Edward Rommen correctly argues that
missiology is more than just one aspect of its qualities or
disciplines. However, he believes
“we must pay attention to the propositions that we are importing into the
exercise.”[1] Rommen
warns against over-sophistication in our approach to integrating missiology
with the social sciences in particular. He suggests that the church has become
comfortable in its successful applications of social science for missions, but
he whimsically admits “it is amazing what can be accomplished without the Holy
Spirit.”[2]
His approach is one of caution. And he believes that it can only be remedies
through a proper dependence upon the Holy Spirit’s work instead of
organizational management.
David Bosch
David Bosch is also cautious in his opinions about the use
of statistical analysis in missions. This appears to be partly because of how
some have made extreme applications as they integrate statistics and theology
or eschatology. He seems to suggest that a strong adherence to an imminent
parousia or second coming of Christ has led some to their greatest motive for
mission, more so than a love for people. Admittedly, Hudson Taylor was
motivated by this premillennial belief, and it did result in his own employment
of statistical study. But many missiologists in the twentieth century began to
see Matthew 24:14 as an eschatological proof text for doing missions. If the
gospel could just get preached to all nations, then the Lord’s return could be
hastened. “Some have even borrowed huge amounts of money and mortgaged their
homes to invest in evangelization for the purpose of bringing back the King.”[3]
A. T. Pierson “estimated the number of pennies and the number of right-hearted evangelists required to bring
the millennium.”[4] Thus, statistical analysis became crucial for
completing the task of hastening the end. Bosch believes this is dangerous.
[1]
Edward Rommen, 2009. Lecture presented for MIS 9950 PhD class at Southeastern
Baptist Theological Seminary. Wake
Forest , North Carolina ,
January 7.
[2] Edward
Rommen, 2009. Lecture.
[3]
Frank Caleb Jansen, “When Theology, Missiology and Futurology Clash,” International Journal of Frontier Missions 12:1
(January/February 1995), 3. Cited on 19 February 2009. Online: http://www.ijfm.org/PDFs_IJFM/12_1_PDFs/Jansen.pdf.
[4]
David J. Bosch, Transforming Mission : Paradigm Shifts in Theology of Mission
(Maryknoll , New York : Orbis, 2007), 316–317.
No comments:
Post a Comment