In Life and Practice in the Early Church: A Documentary Reader, Steve McKinion systematically outlines primary texts related to six early practices of the Church. If you're going to buy it, go for the Kindle version ($10), as the hardback is pretty pricey right now.
In this book, baptism, worship, proclamation, the Eucharist, evangelism and Church officers
are categorized, and then related writings are highlighted. McKinion's book is a
“survey of how theology was actually lived and played out by the community of faith
called the Christian church” (p. 1). McKinion perhaps inadvertently shows where
the early Church deviated from New Testament writers. As a text that so
adequately describes the historical development of the church, the issues of
baptism, worship and polity are especially important for missionaries who seek
to plant New Testament churches today.
Baptism
was initially a means of initiation into the local church. By the third and
fourth centuries, however, it began to be institutionalized. As baptism initiates
or catechumens awaited baptism, they had to separate from regular church
members and face a period of testing to make sure they were really regenerate.
As a result, baptism later was believed to be the final act of regeneration and
even infants began to be baptized. Fasting was made a regular part of this
observance as well. Some like Tertullian argued for a delayed baptism, but for
the most part the Church fathers all saw a regenerative effect of baptism. So
by the fourth century only appointed leaders carried out this sacrament. Today
on the mission field, questions about who can baptize as well as when and where
it is to be done still plague many missionaries. Missiologists explain that
rapid church planting occurs when converts are baptized immediately, and many
cite the New Testament for justification. But early church history went a
different direction.
The
act of worship was initially a part of daily meeting in homes with variation in
style and mode. “As time progressed, the components of the worship service
became more standardized” (p. 43). Music became a subject of disagreement for
some like Clement. Ignatius and Justin argued that worship services were
primarily for Sundays. The Didache promoted strict worship attendance by those
who had properly prepared for it. Tertullian and the Apostolic Constitutions
describe the later worship services which had taken a more rigid form by the
fourth century. Catechumens were excluded from certain parts of the service,
while a lack of faithful attendance was not tolerated. The emphasis on place
became primary for worship services, and the overarching emphasis during the
service was reading of Scripture and exposition. It is argued that churches
multiply more rapidly when participative worship becomes a daily meeting
revolving around shared meals in a home, but this is not the direction early
churches went.
Initially,
the roles of bishop and deacon outlined by Paul to Timothy and Titus were
expanded into ordained offices for the Church. Jerome said the “distinct office
of bishop developed in which the elders chose one of their own to be the primus inter pares, or ‘first among
equals’” (p. 151). Eventually, a bishop came to be not just a pastor of one
congregation but had authority over many churches. Because of unique needs, the
early Church recognized offices of elder, bishop, presbyter, deacon, subdeacon,
reader and widow. Because these offices were held in high regard, the issues of
marriage and ordination became primary. Some would allow church officers to
only be married once, and if they had never been married prior to ordination,
they could not ever be married. Ordination was done only “in the presence of
two other bishops, and preferably three, in order to have had adequate
testimony to the candidate’s character” (p. 163). Missiologists say that the
best form of church polity is a representation of shared accountability and
obedience to Scripture. It looks like the early church may have initially gone
this direction, but restrictions placed on what later developed into a separate
clergy had a stifling effect on growth.
The book is a good reference tool for anyone interested in early church history as well as for those who want to see the role the early documents play on current ecclesiology. His writing is straightforward and unbiased, creating a book I'd recommend across denominational lines.
No comments:
Post a Comment